Boston Bombing News: Throwing Fish Out or Convicting The Big Fish?
Most everyone knows the statuses of those accused in relation to the Boston Marathon Bombings, but if you’ve been living under a rock for the last several months, here’s a summary of how I see it:
Stephen Silva – Although Silva’s charges of conspiracy to distribute heroin, distribution of heroin and possession of a firearm with an obliterated serial number do not connect him to the Boston Marathon Bombings, he has been connected via my personal favorite reporter (serious facetiousness) Michele McPhee. The title of this article simply reads, “Gun Used By Boston Bomber Linked to Alleged Heroin Dealer.” Whether Silva’s gun truly is the same gun used by the Tsarnaevs, we have yet to know, but Silva is now knee-deep in the Boston Marathon Bombings. Silva is being detained and awaits the start of his trial. As far as I can tell (looking only at his docket) his trial date has not been set. I wonder if prosecution will have Silva testify against Dzhokhar prior to any final decision in his own case?
Robel Phillipos – We all know Phillipos was convicted in October of two counts of making false statements in a terrorism investigation. He now faces up to 16 years in prison and he is under house arrest until his sentencing, which is set for January 29th. Of course, his case is waiting for the filing of post-verdict motions and defense appeals. I wonder if prosecution will have Phillipos testify against Dzhokhar prior to any final decision in his own case?
Khairullozhon Matanov – Matanov, similar to Phillipos, is accused of lying to investigators, or more precisely, making a materially false, fictitious, and fraudulent statement in a federal investigation involving international and domestic terrorism. In addition, destruction, alteration, and falsification of records, documents, and a tangible object in a federal investigation. Is that anything like throwing fish overboard? Matanov is being detained and awaiting his trial, which is predicted to start June, 2015. Meanwhile, Matanov appears to be having a hard time in detention, having been beaten, finally moved and his old attorney assigned. I wonder if prosecution will have Matanov testify against Dzhokhar prior to any final decision in his own case?
Azamat Tazhayakov – Yes, Tazhayakov was convicted back in July of obstructing a terrorism investigation. And yes he testified in Phillipos’ trial, hoping to get a reduced sentence. He faces up to 25 years in prison. However, his case is at a stand still, having all hearings and deadlines cancelled pending resolution by the Supreme Court of Yates v. United States. Once the Supreme Court decides whether or not a fish is a tangible object, I guess it will be decided whether a backpack is a tangible object as well. I wonder if prosecution will have Tazhayakov testify against Dzhokhar prior to any final decision in his own case?
Dias Kadyrbayev – Kadyrbayev, also charged with obstructing a terrorism investigation, changed his plea to guilty after the conviction of his friend, Tazhayakov. He, like Tazhayakov, faces up to 25 years in prison. Kadyrbayev’s case is also on holding pending resolution by the Supreme Court of Yates v. United States. One more time, I wonder if prosecution will have Kadyrbayev testify against Dzhokhar prior to any final decision in his own case?
All of these Tsarnaev acquaintances are waiting. Are they all really waiting for Supreme Court decisions, or court date availability, or what? Is it coincidence that these acquaintances’ outcomes are not finalized before the start of Dzhokhar’s trial? Prosecution has already given Tazhayakov hope of a reduced sentence in exchange for testifying at the Phillipos trial. Exactly what would prosecution hope to gain if they make such offers to Kadyrbayev, Tazhayakov, Phillipos, Silva and Matanov for testifying against Dzhokhar? If Dzhokhar is found guilty, I wonder what the sentences of his friends will be? Do you think they will be minimal since the friends will have held up their part of the bargain? Will they be “rewarded”?