President Obama spoke to service men and women at MacDill Air Force Base yesterday about the U.S. strategy to degrade and ultimately destroy ISIL — a terrorist organization that is killing innocent, unarmed civilians in both Iraq and Syria. ISIL, also known as ISIS or the Islamic State, is also responsible for the brutal murders of American journalists Jim Foley and Steven Sotloff. –5 Things to Know: The President Lays Out the U.S. Plan to Degrade and Destroy ISIL, whitehouse.gov
How many civilians were killed by the US in the same time period?
1. ISIL is threatening America and our allies.
Our intelligence community has not yet detected specific plots from ISIL against our homeland, but they have repeatedly threatened our core interests, including our personnel, our embassies, our consulates, and our facilities in Iraq, Syria, and in the broader Middle East. “If left unchecked, they could pose a growing threat to the United States,” he said.
The US has toppled nearly 50 regimes it did not like, and tried to assassinate 30 world leaders. It invaded Iraq, committed War Crimes and no one was punished (except the few who revealed this behavior). Who is the greater threat: ISIS or US?
2. The U.S. continues to conduct targeted airstrikes against ISIL.
The U.S. Air Force has conducted more than 160 airstrikes against ISIL, successfully protecting our personnel and facilities, killing ISIL fighters, and giving space for Iraqi and Kurdish forces to reclaim key territory. “They’ve helped our partners on the ground break ISIL sieges; helped rescue civilians cornered on a mountain; helped save the lives of thousands of innocent men, women and children,” the President said.
How many innocent have been killed in the Air Strikes, and what’s the estimate of the number of enemies generated by these actions?
3. American forces that have been deployed to Iraq do not and will not have a combat mission.
“As your Commander-in-Chief, I will not commit you, and the rest of our Armed Forces, to fighting another ground war in Iraq,” the President told servicemembers. Along with our airstrikes, U.S. forces will train, equip, advise, and assist local partners on the ground “so that they can secure their own countries’ futures.”
How will we win without “boots on the ground”? And what is our exit criteria, or what does success look like?
4. This is not and will not be America’s fight alone.
The U.S. will lead a broad coalition of countries who have a stake in this fight. France and the UK are already flying with us over Iraq, and other countries have committed to join this effort. Saudi Arabia has agreed to host American efforts to train and equip Syrian opposition forces. Australia and Canada are going to send military advisors to Iraq, while Germany is sending paratroopers to help offer training. Arab nations have agreed to strengthen their support for Iraq’s new government, a key ally in our strategy to defeat ISIL.
When will you put this to a vote in each and ever country affected? Including the US?
International partners will help us cut off ISIL funding, gather intelligence, and prevent foreign fighters from entering — or leaving — the Middle East. And nearly 30 nations have joined American humanitarian relief to help civilians, including Sunni, Shia, Christian, Yezidi, or other religious minorities, that ISIL has driven from their homes.
Will help us cut off ISIL funding? Why not “have already”? How will the Salafis, funded by Saudi Money, both be punished and eliminated?
5. Congress should provide the authorities and resources the U.S. military needs to succeed.
The President has called on Congress to support our military with the necessary resources to train and equip Syrian opposition fighters. As he has said, America’s leadership position is strongest when the President and Congress work together and show a united front.
“Sending our servicemembers into harm’s way is not a decision I ever take lightly,” the President said. “It is the hardest decision I make as President. Nothing else comes close.”
“Congress should provide”? Before having answers to all the questions? Why?
But this strategy will require the best military force in the world:
Frankly, there just aren’t a lot of other folks who can perform in the same ways — in fact, there are none. And there are some things only we can do. There are some capabilities only we have. That’s because of you — your dedication, your skill, your work, your families supporting you, your training, your command structure. Our Armed Forces are unparalleled and unique. And so when we’ve got a big problem somewhere around the world, it falls on our shoulders. And sometimes that’s tough. But that’s what sets us apart. That’s why we’re America. That’s what the stars and stripes are all about.
How many military successes have there been since the US Military invaded Grenada? Is this the appropriate use of our military? What is the definition of success in each and every case? How do we know when we’ve won?
“In an uncertain world full of breathtaking change, the one constant is American leadership.”
And, because of the strength and dedication of America’s military, the President made clear that we will send an unmistakable message to ISIL:
Whether in Iraq or in Syria, these terrorists will learn the same thing that the leaders of al Qaeda already know: We mean what we say; our reach is long; if you threaten America, you will find no safe haven. We will find you eventually.
Is this the only approach? We’ve heard this before, and to date it has not worked (See failed states). What are the alternatives? What was considered, and by inference what was not considered?