CommunityFDL Main Blog

Who’s a Terrorist, What’s a Terrorist?

Protesters on a march, some dressed in black bloc or as clowns

Terrorists?

Terrorist and terrorism are probably the most often used words in today’s media, making an inquiry into their definition and use long overdue. Having shifted the role of watchdog to whistle-blowers as part of its new mission to propagate the government’s views, journalists mindlessly apply the word “terrorist” to any group or individual engaging in activities that governments do not like.

Although it has no legally binding definition under international criminal law, according to Wikipedia, “Terrorism is the systematic use of terror, often violent, especially as a means of coercion.” Common definitions tend to ignore the crucial notion of coercion, referring only to violent acts intended to create fear (terror), perpetrated for a religious, political or, ideological goal that deliberately targets or disregards the safety of civilians (otherwise known as non-combatants). Both these definitions enable governments to designate anyone who disagrees with them — regardless of how they manifest that disagreement — as a terrorist.

Under these definitions, the perpetrators of the 9/11 attack can rightly be defined as terrorists.  Clearly however, groups and individuals whose aspirations and beliefs are simply in conflict with those of governments cannot. This makes it imperative to deconstruct the method used by power and its enablers to reverse engineer the “civilized world’s” sacred rights of citizenship into offenses punishable by detention and death.

Government begins by labeling ideas that deviate from its own as “extremist,” then it dubs those holding such views as extremists; then it moves on to alternating the word “extremist” with that of “terrorist.” Finally, like seasoning on a botched recipe, it equates both words with the term “anarchist,” scrubbing the word’s philosophical meaning to leave only actions of crowd violence perpetrated by individuals, as indelibly memorialized by Sacco and Vanzetti in the early twentieth century.

While the two Italian anarchists were being condemned to death for a crime they probably did not commit, Zionists fighting to free Mandate Palestine from British rule were setting up two terrorist organizations. The motto of the Haganah and the Irgun, “only thus” was inscribed beneath a hand holding a rifle superimposed on a map of Mandatory Palestine, implying that force was the only way to “liberate the homeland.” Although they were at odds with official Jewish policies, these groups are never referred to as “terrorists,” but as “paramiltary organizations.” Similarly, European underground fighters that thwarted German occupations during the Second World War are never referred to as terrorist organizations but are correctly labelled as “resistance fighters.”

Why then are Palestinians fighting to free their land from Israeli occupation referred to as “terrorists” rather than as “resistance fighters?” The long and bloody resistance of the Palestinian people to occupation, using the same methods as those employed by Irgun and Haganah, played a key role in the West’s gradual banalization of the word “terrorist,” with successive Israeli governments, along with the United States, Canada, the European Union, Turkey and Japan, designating Hamas as a terrorist organization. Unbeknownst to most Americans, Arab nations are not the only ones to disagree with this label: Iran, Russia, Norway, Switzerland, the United Nations and most Latin American countries hold firm to their dictionaries.

Never mind: the Palestinian precedent — as well as that of Syria’s civil war, in which government supporters are referred to as terrorists while Islamists seeking to establish a Caliphate receive American weapons — prepared the terrain for Ukrainians opposing a government that came to power through a bloody coup to be labelled as terrorists — or at best ‘rebels’. Section 802 of the USA PATRIOT Act, signed into law by President Bush on October 26, 2011, is applied urbi et orbi.

CommunityMy FDL

Who’s a Terrorist, What’s a Terrorist?

Terrorist and terrorism are probably the most often used words in today’s media, making an inquiry into their definition and use long overdue. Having shifted the role of watchdog to whistle-blowers as part of its new mission to propagate the government’s views, journalists mindlessly apply the word “terrorist” to any group or individual engaging in activities that governments do not like.

Protesters on a march, some dressed in black bloc or as clowns

Terrorists?

Although it has no legally binding definition under international criminal law, according to Wikipedia, “Terrorism is the systematic use of terror, often violent, especially as a means of coercion.” Common definitions tend to ignore the crucial notion of coercion, referring only to violent acts intended to create fear (terror), perpetrated for a religious, political or, ideological goal that deliberately targets or disregards the safety of civilians (otherwise known as non-combatants). Both these definitions enable governments to designate anyone who disagrees with them — regardless of how they manifest that disagreement — as a terrorist.

Under these definitions, the perpetrators of the 9/11 attack can rightly be defined as terrorists.  Clearly however, groups and individuals whose aspirations and beliefs are simply in conflict with those of governments cannot. This makes it imperative to deconstruct the method used by power and its enablers to reverse engineer the “civilized world’s” sacred rights of citizenship into offenses punishable by detention and death.

Government begins by labeling ideas that deviate from its own as “extremist,” then it dubs those holding such views as extremists; then it moves on to alternating the word “extremist” with that of “terrorist.” Finally, like seasoning on a botched recipe, it equates both words with the term “anarchist,” scrubbing the word’s philosophical meaning to leave only actions of crowd violence perpetrated by individuals, as indelibly memorialized by Sacco and Vanzetti in the early twentieth century.

While the two Italian anarchists were being condemned to death for a crime they probably did not commit, Zionists fighting to free Mandate Palestine from British rule were setting up two terrorist organizations. The motto of the Haganah and the Irgun, “only thus” was inscribed beneath a hand holding a rifle superimposed on a map of Mandatory Palestine, implying that force was the only way to “liberate the homeland.” Although they were at odds with official Jewish policies, these groups are never referred to as “terrorists,” but as “paramiltary organizations.” Similarly, European underground fighters that thwarted German occupations during the Second World War are never referred to as terrorist organizations but are correctly labelled as “resistance fighters.”

Why then are Palestinians fighting to free their land from Israeli occupation referred to as “terrorists” rather than as “resistance fighters?” The long and bloody resistance of the Palestinian people to occupation, using the same methods as those employed by Irgun and Haganah, played a key role in the West’s gradual banalization of the word “terrorist,” with successive Israeli governments, along with the United States, Canada, the European Union, Turkey and Japan, designating Hamas as a terrorist organization. Unbeknownst to most Americans, Arab nations are not the only ones to disagree with this label: Iran, Russia, Norway, Switzerland, the United Nations and most Latin American countries hold firm to their dictionaries.

Never mind: the Palestinian precedent — as well as that of Syria’s civil war, in which government supporters are referred to as terrorists while Islamists seeking to establish a Caliphate receive American weapons — prepared the terrain for Ukrainians opposing a government that came to power through a bloody coup to be labelled as terrorists — or at best ‘rebels’. Section 802 of the USA PATRIOT Act, signed into law by President Bush on October 26, 2011, is applied urbi et orbi.

(more…)

Previous post

Capital Punishment

Next post

Battle Lines Drawn On New Coal Industry Rules

Oxdown Diaries

Oxdown Diaries