CommunityFDL ActionFDL Main Blog

Why the Rush to Action in Syria?

Secretary of State John Kerry addresses the nation.

One of the more disturbing aspects of the many serious issues regarding President Obama potentially bombing Syria is the incredibly rush to take action. We see it with the push for an incredibly quick vote in the UK on the issue.

There is no immediate danger to Americans or American interests. Our allies are not being threatened. There is no ticking clock. There appears to be no impending action from Assad or the rebels that needs to be stopped. There is no reason to think action now, as opposed to week from now, will have a noticeably different impact.

We have the time to get this right, yet Secretary of State John Kerry sure makes it sound like the Obama administration has already decided to take action in the very near future, before the UN inspectors even have a chance to issue their full report.

If the administration thinks the proof of chemical weapons being used is so strong, there is no harm in waiting for the UN report. In fact, waiting for a UN report confirming chemical weapons should help improve our case internationally. Let’s see what the report says so Congress at least has the chance to make an informed decision.

There is no reason a strike tomorrow, next week, or the week after should make a difference to our goal of “sending a message.” If we blow up something tomorrow or in two weeks I’m sure the Assad regime would still know why.

Why is there this rush on part of the administration?

Previous post

Kerry Forgot US Helped Iraq Use Chemical Weapons, Makes Other Odd Statements On Syria

Next post

Kerry Forgot US Helped Iraq Use Chemical Weapons, Makes Other Odd Statements on Syria

Jon Walker

Jon Walker

Jonathan Walker grew up in New Jersey. He graduated from Wesleyan University in 2006. He is an expert on politics, health care and drug policy. He is also the author of After Legalization and Cobalt Slave, and a Futurist writer at