Apparently Clapper Makes It a Habit to Lie While Defending NSA Programs
Not only did Director of National Intelligence James Clapper purposely give misleading answers to Congress while under oath to hide the existence of NSA programs, but he also apparently lies about what these programs accomplished. The Obama administration declassified details about a terrorist plot that was supposedly stopped by PRISM, but Clapper got the basic details wrong. From the Huffington Post:
In the rush to defend the surveillance programs, however, government officials have changed their stories and misstated key facts of the Zazi plot. And they’ve left out one important detail: The email that disrupted the plan could easily have been intercepted without PRISM. […]
In using Zazi to defend the surveillance program, government officials have further confused things by misstating key details about the plot.
Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said investigators “found backpacks with bombs.” Really, the bombs hadn’t been completed and the backpacks the FBI found were unrelated to the plot.
Neither of these misleading statements were the result of Clapper making a simple mistake when asked a question he wasn’t expected. That could possibly be excused. These were prepared remarks.
If the only way you can defend your programs is to lie about it then it is likely a very bad program.
Photo released under Public Domain