CommunityMy FDL

CIA Torture Architects Debunk ‘Ticking Time Bomb’ Scenario

In a panel hosted by the American Enterprise Institute Jan. 29, CIA torture architects and operatives said that “enhanced interrogation techniques” were not used to extract information under duress, but to “break the will to resist” to ensure that truthful information was given while under non-coercive interrogation later on.

2. EITs were used to break the will to resist, not to extract information directly. Hayden acknowledged that prisoners might say anything to stop their suffering. (Like the other panelists, he insisted EITs weren’t torture.) That’s why “we never asked anybody anything we didn’t know the answer to, while they were undergoing the enhanced interrogation techniques. The techniques were not designed to elicit truth in the moment.” Instead, EITs were used in a controlled setting, in which interrogators knew the answers and could be sure they were inflicting misery only when the prisoner said something false. The point was to create an illusion of godlike omniscience and omnipotence so that the prisoner would infer, falsely, that his captors always knew when he was lying or withholding information. More broadly, said Hayden, the goal was “to take someone who had come into our custody absolutely defiant and move them into a state or a zone of cooperation” by convincing them that “you are no longer in control of your destiny. You are in our hands.” Thereafter, the prisoner would cooperate without need for EITs. Rodriguez explained: “Once you got through the enhanced interrogation process, then the real interrogation began. … The knowledge base was so good that these people knew that we actually were not going to be fooled. It was an essential tool to validate that the people were being truthful.” [Emphasis added.]

I hope this puts to bed the ridiculous Jack Bauer hypothetical.

Previous post

Monsanto and the Banality of Evil

Next post

Greece: Repression of the People by the Government

MSPB Watch

MSPB Watch

1 Comment