Election 2012: Why I won’t vote for Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Gildea
(nor any other incumbent Minnesota State Judge)
The Minnesota Courts have finally committed such an outrageous and undeniable act of tyranny, that even the most disinterested and skeptical of Minnesota citizens are forced to acknowledge it as an act against public policy and the best interests of WE THE PEOPLE. Even those persons most loyal to the Minnesota Judiciary recognize this act as creating “case law” that is an unmistakable departure the “Rule of Law” and every citizen’s Natural Law Right to “Due Process”.
MINNESOTA LAWYERS NOT LEGALLY REQUIRED
TO TREAT THEIR CLIENTS ETHICALLY
In the secret, unpublished, clandestine Appellate Court Ruling of Fabian, et. al v Vollkommer MN A10-1205 (http://goo.gl/da5cy)the Minnesota District, Appellate and Supreme Courts have ruled that Minnesota lawyers do not have the legal requirement to treat their clients ethically. Paraphrasing a portion of the ruling, the Minnesota District, Appellate and Supreme Court ruled that the “Minnesota Lawyers’ Code of Professional Conduct is not an implied covenant in any legal services contract between a Minnesota Lawyer and their client”.
Under the Signature of Chief Justice Gildea, the Minnesota Supreme Court refused to hear the appeal of ruling that shatters the Rule of Law in Minnesota and voids every citizen’s Natural Law Right to Due Process.( http://goo.gl/alqA6) (Chief Justice Lorie Skjevern Gildea was appointed by Republican Governor Tim Pawlenty in 2006)
For most citizens, in matters of law it is of paramount importance that their counsel’s duty to treat them ethically be held inviolate. The laws have unnecessarily yet deliberately been written in a convoluted and complex manner that few common citizens can hope to understand., let alone represent themselves in a court of law. By acts imperceptible to the average citizen, their own lawyer can determine the outcome of a case by, for example, failing to put evidence on the official record or allowing the other party to put evidence on the record that would appropriately be objected to. These and other “maneuvers” that can almost invisibly influence the outcome litigation demand that lawyers be legally bound to treat their clients ethically, lest they be tempted by bribe, political consideration or pressure of a judge to do otherwise.
Sans any legitimate reason being provided by the Minnesota Judiciary, can their be any doubt as to the intent of this A10-1205 ruling. That intent being to allow lawyers to “legally” collude with judges and other lawyers to fix the outcome of Court Cases?
This Clandestine Case Law establishes that the Minnesota Lawyers’ Code of Professional Conduct is nothing more than false advertising. Unwitting Citizens are…
To Continue reading for free, please click here-> http://t.co/kTyL9PIZ
Those were my thoughts.
Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking your valuable time to read and reflect upon what is written here.
Please join with me in mutually pledging to each other and our fellow citizens our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor to our mutual endeavors of restoring liberty and economic opportunity to WE THE PEOPLE as our Founding Fathers envisioned and intended. [Last Paragraph, Declaration of Independence http://bit.ly/ruPE7z]
This article is written with the same intentions as Thomas Paine http://ushistory.org/paine. I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense” http://amzn.to/kbRuar
Keep Fighting the Good Fight!
Lawless America #LawlessAmerica
Justice in Minnesota #JIM
Bring Home the Politicians #BHTP
Get out of our House #GOOOH
Critical Thinking Notice – This author advises you as no politician would dare. Exercise Critical Thinking (http://bit.ly/ubI6ve) in determining the truthfulness of anything you read or hear. Do not passively accept nor believe anything anyone tells you, including this author… unless and until you verify it yourself with sources you trust and could actively defend your perspective to anyone who might debate you to the contrary of your perspective.