CommunityMy FDL

Bernie Sanders Explains First-Ever Fed Audit Showing Massive Conflicts of Interest

And that’s putting it mildly, especially given yesterday’s Fed action as per BofA/Merrill Lynch.…  But here’s Bernie on Dylan Ratigan.

The non-partisan GAO issued a 108-page report on the Federal Reserve.  Sanders summarizes the report at his page here, which says in part (and DD writes about it here):

“The most powerful entity in the United States is riddled with conflicts of interest,” Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said after reviewing the Government Accountability Office report. The study required by a Sanders Amendment to last year’s Wall Street reform law examined Fed practices never before subjected to such independent, expert scrutiny.

The GAO detailed instance after instance of top executives of corporations and financial institutions using their influence as Federal Reserve directors to financially benefit their firms, and, in at least one instance, themselves. “Clearly it is unacceptable for so few people to wield so much unchecked power,” Sanders said. “Not only do they run the banks, they run the institutions that regulate the banks.”

Sanders said he will work with leading economists to develop legislation to restructure the Fed and bar the banking industry from picking Fed directors. “This is exactly the kind of outrageous behavior by the big banks and Wall Street that is infuriating so many Americans,” Sanders said.

The corporate affiliations of Fed directors from such banking and industry giants as General Electric, JP Morgan Chase, and Lehman Brothers pose “reputational risks” to the Federal Reserve System, the report said. Giving the banking industry the power to both elect and serve as Fed directors creates “an appearance of a conflict of interest,” the report added.

The 108-page report found that at least 18 specific current and former Fed board members were affiliated with banks and companies that received emergency loans from the Federal Reserve during the financial crisis.

[T]here are no restrictions in Fed rules on directors communicating concerns about their respective banks to the staff of the Federal Reserve. It also said many directors own stock or work directly for banks that are supervised and regulated by the Federal Reserve. The rules, which the Fed has kept secret, let directors tied to banks participate in decisions involving how much interest to charge financial institutions and how much credit to provide healthy banks and institutions in “hazardous” condition. Even when situations arise that run afoul of Fed’s conflict rules and waivers are granted, the GAO said the waivers are kept hidden from the public.

Former financial fraud prosecutor William Black wrote of yesterday’s decision by the Fed to allow BofA to dump billions of dollars of losses onto American taxpayer via the FDIC:

“The sad fact is that very few Americans will be surprised that the Fed represented the interests of the SDIs even though they were directly contrary to the interests of the nation. The Fed’s constant demands for (and celebration of) “independence” from democratic government, combined with slavish dependence on and service to the CEOs of the SDIs has gone beyond scandal to the point of farce. I suggest organized “laugh ins” whenever Fed spokespersons prate about their “independence.”

William Black was on DemocracyNow! yesterday speaking to banking fraud.

These items need to be mainlined to those Occupying Wall Street all over the nation.  Dave DeGraw and William back will help in New York.

Washingtonsblog has several ideas for abolishing the Fed, and quotes numerous economists here.

And as requested by northwestbynorth:

(cross-posted at


Previous post

The War on Sex-Ed: gays, girls and defunding Planned Parenthood

Next post

Deportation Reviews Still Weeks Away