CommunityPam's House Blend

"I would have been the last to know had my partner been killed"

Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, as it has in the past regarding DADT with its Letters From the Frontlines series, puts a human face on the toll that Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell has taken on those serving in silence. Each day this week, SLDN will feature a letter of a service member that has felt that impact of this discriminatory legislation.

Below the fold is a letter is by Lynne Kennedy, partner to Capt. Joan Darrah, U.S. Navy (Ret.).  They have been together for 20 years this December.With the Pentagon’s family survey now in the field, Servicemembers Legal Defense Network (SLDN), a national, legal services and policy organization dedicated to ending “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (DADT), will release a letter each day this week from family members and spouses of former service members impacted by DADT.

As the Pentagon reaches out to 150,000 straight couples on how their lives are impacted, these letters will share the perspective of those forced to serve under this law alongside their loved ones. SLDN is urging supporters of repeal to call, write, and schedule in-district meetings with both their senators as the defense budget, which contains the repeal amendment, moves to the floor just weeks from now. How you can help.

General Carter F. Ham

Commanding General, U.S. Army Europe

Co-Chair, Comprehensive Review Working Group

Hon. Jeh C. Johnson

General Counsel, U.S. Department of Defense

Co-Chair, Comprehensive Review Working Group

CC:       U.S. Sen. Carl M. Levin, Chairman, Senate Armed Services Committee

U.S. Sen. John S. McCain, Ranking Member, Senate Armed Services Committee

U.S. Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman, Member, Senate Armed Services Committee

   Dear General Ham and Mr. Johnson:

   In 1990 - while working as a reference librarian at the Library of Congress -- I met Joan Darrah, an active duty Naval Officer.  I already knew about "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," but I soon woke up to the harsh reality that loved ones of gay and lesbian family members are forced to serve in silence, too.

   Over the years, Joan had adjusted to living two lives -- in the closet at work and out after hours. For me, it was a bit of an adjustment as I had been fortunate to work for an employer who valued my skills and expertise and realized that my being a lesbian in no way detracted from my ability to do a great job.

   I knew that Joan could be deployed at any moment.  She may be away from home for two or three years.  I realized that being with an active duty military officer was even more constricting than I could have possibly imagined and I worried constantly about Joan's well being.  Yet, through it all, I knew our relationship was worth the compromises.  I knew we had to make it work for Joan to continue to serve our Country.

   There were so many things that we had to be careful about. For example, Joan had asked that I not call her at work unless it was truly an emergency. When we were out in public if Joan saw someone from work, I learned to "disappear," until Joan's co-worker moved on.  We didn't dare go to nice restaurants on Valentine's Day or even Saturday nights. We could not show any familiarity while out in public.  I went to parties at colleagues' homes alone lest a guest I didn't know learn that Joan was in the Navy.

   The events of September 11, 2001, caused us both appreciate more fully the true impact of DADT on our lives and the reality of our mutual sacrifices. At 8:30 a.m. that morning, Joan went to a meeting in the Pentagon.  At 9:30 a.m., she left that meeting.  At 9:37 a.m., the plane flew into the Pentagon and destroyed the exact space that Joan had left less than eight minutes earlier, killing seven of her colleagues.

    In the days and weeks that followed, Joan went to several funerals and memorial services for her co-workers who had been killed. Most people attended these services with their spouses whose support was critical at this difficult time, yet Joan was forced to go alone, even though I really wanted to be with her to provide support.

   As the numbness began to wear off, it hit me how incredibly alone I would have been had Joan been killed. The military is known for how it pulls together and helps people; we talk of the "military family," which is a way of saying we always look after each other, especially in times of need.  But, none of that support would have been available for me, because under DADT, I didn't exist.

   In fact, I would have been one of the last people to know had Joan been killed, because nowhere in her paperwork or emergency contact information had Joan dared to list my name.

   Whenever I hear Joan recount the events of that day, I relive it and realize all over again how devastated I would have been had she been killed.   I also think of the partners of service members injured or killed in Iraq and Afghanistan.  They are unable to get any support from the military and they must be careful about the amount of support they offer to their closeted service member loved ones.

   The events of September 11th caused us to stop and reassess exactly what was most important in our lives. During that process, we realized that this discriminatory law was causing us to make a much bigger sacrifice than either of us had ever admitted.

   Eight months later, in June 2002, Joan retired from the U.S. Navy, and I retired from the Library of Congress.  If it wasn't for DADT, we might both still be serving in our respective positions.

   Lynne Kennedy

Previous post

Credit Card Companies Jack Interest Rates in Advance of New Rules

Next post

Part Tinker Bell, Part Predator Drone: The Fantasy of the Presidency as Deus ex Machina

Pam Spaulding

Pam Spaulding