m146638Lois Herr has a message for all of you helping to defend reproductive choice by phone banking and spreading the word through One Voice For Choice,

“Don’t forget it’s Stupak/PITTS – I’m the one running against him in PA-16 and I want everyone to know that there’s a radical Republican co-sponsor who should lose his seat over this.”

She’s right. Most of us forget that the Stupak/Pitts amendment’s true author was Joe Pitts, who has one of the most radical, anti-choice records in congress.

  • Voted NO on expanding research to more embryonic stem cell lines. (Jan 2007)
  • Voted NO on allowing human embryonic stem cell research. (May 2005)
  • Voted YES on restricting interstate transport of minors to get abortions. (Apr 2005)
  • Voted YES on making it a crime to harm a fetus during another crime. (Feb 2004)
  • Voted YES on banning partial-birth abortion except to save mother’s life. (Oct 2003)
  • Voted YES on forbidding human cloning for reproduction & medical research. (Feb 2003)
  • Voted YES on funding for health providers who don’t provide abortion info. (Sep 2002)
  • Voted YES on banning Family Planning funding in US aid abroad. (May 2001)
  • Voted YES on federal crime to harm fetus while committing other crimes. (Apr 2001)
  • Voted YES on banning partial-birth abortions. (Apr 2000)
  • Voted YES on barring transporting minors to get an abortion. (Jun 1999)
  • Rated 0% by NARAL, indicating a pro-life voting record. (Dec 2003)
  • Rated 100% by the NRLC, indicating a pro-life stance. (Dec 2006)
  • Prohibit transporting minors across state lines for abortion. (Jan 2008)
  • Grant the pre-born equal protection under 14th Amendment. (Jan 2007)
  • Report on Medicaid payments to abortion providers. (Apr 2009)
  • Declare preborn as persons under 14th amendment. (Feb 2009)



Pitt’s record puts truth to Stupak’s lie that their anti-choice amendment does nothing but codify existing law. No, these blood-brothers in the C Street “Family” had one goal, and one goal only, to make safe, legal abortion a thing of the past.

Lois Herr knows this all too well when she decided to run against Joe Pitts,

I want to help solve our health care, economic, environmental and energy problems, and all Pitts wants to do is stand in the way of women using private funds to pay for full reproductive coverage. His one issue is abortion and he will make it a crime again if he can. He and his C Street cult are hijacking healthcare and I object. For this alone he should lose his seat in Congress. Watching Pitts and his fellow radicals in Congress rant and rave about women’s bodies, whether it’s abortion or mammograms, makes me angry. What hypocrites! They refuse to support a public option in healthcare because they don’t want government involved, yet they would have government make for women the most intimate and personal life decisions. And then there are others in Congress who would accept restrictions on women in order to pass a healthcare bill, any heathcare bill. Time for me to fight again for basic women’s rights. Not on my watch will the clock be turned back.

Lois Herr is putting her money where her mouth is. Despite the holiday season, and her busy schedule as a candidate, she’s taking time out to phone bank for One Voice For Choice. Come out tomorrow night and support her, and the future of reproductive rights in this country. Sign up at the link below.

MONDAY, DECEMBER 14

Elizabethtown, PA
6-8pm

m146638Lois Herr has a message for all of you  helping to defend reproductive choice by phone banking and spreading the word through One Voice For Choice,

“Don’t forget it’s Stupak/PITTS – I’m the one running against him in PA-16 and I want everyone to know that there’s a radical Republican co-sponsor who should lose his seat over this.”

She’s right. Most of us forget that the Stupak/Pitts amendment’s true author was Joe Pitts, who has one of the most radical, anti-choice records in congress.

  • Voted NO on expanding research to more embryonic stem cell lines. (Jan 2007)
  • Voted NO on allowing human embryonic stem cell research. (May 2005)
  • Voted YES on restricting interstate transport of minors to get abortions. (Apr 2005)
  • Voted YES on making it a crime to harm a fetus during another crime. (Feb 2004)
  • Voted YES on banning partial-birth abortion except to save mother’s life. (Oct 2003)
  • Voted YES on forbidding human cloning for reproduction & medical research. (Feb 2003)
  • Voted YES on funding for health providers who don’t provide abortion info. (Sep 2002)
  • Voted YES on banning Family Planning funding in US aid abroad. (May 2001)
  • Voted YES on federal crime to harm fetus while committing other crimes. (Apr 2001)
  • Voted YES on banning partial-birth abortions. (Apr 2000)
  • Voted YES on barring transporting minors to get an abortion. (Jun 1999)
  • Rated 0% by NARAL, indicating a pro-life voting record. (Dec 2003)
  • Rated 100% by the NRLC, indicating a pro-life stance. (Dec 2006)
  • Prohibit transporting minors across state lines for abortion. (Jan 2008)
  • Grant the pre-born equal protection under 14th Amendment. (Jan 2007)
  • Report on Medicaid payments to abortion providers. (Apr 2009)
  • Declare preborn as persons under 14th amendment. (Feb 2009)



Pitt’s record puts truth to Stupak’s lie that their anti-choice amendment does nothing but codify existing law.  No, these blood-brothers in the C Street “Family” had one goal, and one goal only, to make safe, legal abortion a thing of the past.

Lois Herr knows this all too well when she decided to run against Joe Pitts,

I want to help solve our health care, economic, environmental and energy problems, and all Pitts wants to do is stand in the way of women using private funds to pay for full reproductive coverage.  His one issue is abortion and he will make it a crime again if he can. He and his C Street cult are hijacking healthcare and I object.  For this alone he should lose his seat in Congress. Watching Pitts and his fellow radicals in  Congress rant and rave about women’s bodies, whether it’s abortion or mammograms, makes me angry.  What hypocrites!  They refuse to support a public option in healthcare because they don’t want government involved, yet they would have government make for women the most intimate and personal life decisions.  And then there are others in Congress who would accept restrictions on women in order to pass a healthcare bill, any heathcare bill.  Time for me to fight again for basic women’s rights. Not on my watch will the clock be turned back.

Lois Herr is putting her money where her mouth is. Despite the holiday season, and her busy schedule as a candidate, she’s taking time out to phone bank for One Voice For Choice. Come out tomorrow night and support her, and the future of reproductive rights in this country. Sign up at the link below.

MONDAY, DECEMBER 14

Elizabethtown, PA
6-8pm

Marta Evry

Marta Evry

My day job is as a film editor for theatrical motion pictures and network television, but my passion is for social justice.