Parental Rights of Non-Legal Parent Upheld by Montana Supreme Court
The Montana Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld the parental rights [PDF] of the non-biological parent of a separated lesbian couple.
The couple had raised their child together for three years. Yet because Montana, like many states, doesn't let same sex couples adopt a child together, only one of two women legally adopted the child. After the couple separated, the woman who legally adopted the child said that letting her ex-partner have parental rights would interfere with her own constitutional right to parent her legal child.
The Court disagreed. Instead, the Court said that parental rights should be based on the existence of a parent-child relationship, which both women had.
Why It Matters
Because many states allow single, but not joint, gay adoption, the Montana decision could eventually impact the parental rights of non-legal parents in these other states. While none of these states has to follow what Montana does, their high courts may still be influenced by what the Montana Court said. However, the particular laws of each state will more affect those courts than decisions from other states.
Further, while in this case the child was adopted, the decision could also affect the rights of a non-biological parent in a same sex relationship with a biological one.
Even in Montana, however, the decision does not give the non-legal parent in a same sex relationship the same parental rights as the legal parent.
Instead of equal rights, the Montana decision said that the non-legal parent has only a “parental interest.” Julie Shapiro, a professor at Seattle University Law School, points out that a “parental interest” is vague:
I’m not sure what that is or what it means. Is [the non-legal parent now] a legal parent? She has an equal voice in decision making, which suggests some equality with [the legal parent]. But it simply isn’t clear to me.
I expect further litigation in Montana or elsewhere about the limits of “parental interests” of non-legal parents.
Finally, be careful what you read. Some political blogs have mischaracterized the decision as treating non-legal parents equal to legal parents. Look at Queerty's post, for example, titled, “Montana Supreme Court's Amazing Adoption Decision: Gays Are Equal Under the Law.” It's important not to treat every pro-gay decision as a proclamation of equality or as an advancement of gay rights, because the effects of these decisions are often much more limited.
[Cross-posted at the Gay Couples Law Blog, which discusses same sex family law, estate planning, and taxes.]