I guess it’s what we should expect from Wasilla, but the Frontiersman has run an op-ed by a Baptist minister based in part on a passage in Daniel: “Neither shall he [Antichrist] regard… the desire of women….”

And one more thing: Sodomy is the only sin for which God came down from heaven to destroy. Though God dealt with many other sins in various ways, there is no other for which he came down from heaven to verify and destroy. In the New Testament, sodomy is declared to be “against nature.” And of the men, Paul in Romans 1 says they leave “the natural use of the woman….”  In effect, there is no greater sin against God than to reject how he made you, and no greater sin against women than to reject how God made them.

But will the Antichrist be a homosexual? Having seen what the Bible says of sodomy, we have no further to look than the book of Daniel, chapter 11 to find our answer. It says, “Neither shall he [Antichrist] regard… the desire of women….” As I said at the onset, I am not the first to draw attention to this, but the verbiage is clear.

I checked my King James Bible, and the word Antichrist appears nowhere in Daniel, but I’m sure that’s just an oversight.  That Daniel was such a slipshod prophet.

Here’s a link to the whole piece:  http://www.frontiersman.com/ar…

Personally, I’m pretty sure I’m not the Antichrist.  I wouldn’t mind being an antipope, though.  Then again, to be an antipope you’d have to be straight, wouldn’t you?