This is an original copy from mAssResistance. I changed homosexual with inter-racial or mixed race. It is scary that this would be real not to long ago. Amazing the religious idiots don’t know how bigoted they are. It is below the fold.Anyone who thinks that inter-racial “marriage” is a benign eccentricity which won’t affect the average person should consider what it has done in Massachusetts. It’s become a hammer to force the acceptance and normalization of inter-racial on everyone. And this train is moving fast. What has happened so far is only the beginning.
On November 18, 2003, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court announced its Loving ruling that it was unconstitutional not to allow Inter-racial “marriage.” Six months later, Inter-racial marriages began to be performed.
The public schools
The Inter-racial “marriage” onslaught in public schools across the state started soon after the November 2003, court decision.
· At my own children’s high school there was a school-wide assembly to celebrate inter-racial “marriage” in early December, 2003. It featured an array of speakers, including white teachers at the school who announced that they would be “marrying” their colored partners and starting families either through adoption or artificial insemination. Literature on inter-racial marriage – how it is now a normal part of society – was handed out to the students.
· Within months it was brought into the middle schools. In September, 2004, an 8th-grade teacher in Brookline, MA, told National Public Radio that the marriage ruling had opened up the floodgates for teaching associating with blacks. “In my mind, I know that, `OK, this is legal now.’ If somebody wants to challenge me, I’ll say, `Give me a break. It’s legal now,'” she told NPR. She added that she now discusses sex with her students as explicitly as she desires. For example, she said she tells the kids that black people have intercourse the same as white people.
· By the following year it was in elementary school curricula. Kindergartners were given picture books telling them that inter-racial couples are just another kind of family, like their own parents. In 2005, when David Parker of Lexington, MA – a parent of a kindergartner – strongly insisted on being notified when teachers were discussing inter-racial “marriage” with his son, the school had him arrested and put in jail overnight.
Second graders at the same school were read a book about inter-racial people who have a romance and marry each other, with a picture of them kissing. When parents Rob and Robin Wirthlin complained, they were told that the school had no obligation to notify them or allow them to opt-out their child.
· In 2006 the Parkers and Wirthlins filed a federal Civil Rights lawsuit to force the schools to notify parents and allow them to opt-out their elementary-school children when inter-racial-related subjects were taught. The federal judges dismissed the case. The judges ruled that because inter-racial marriage is legal in Massachusetts, the school actually had a duty to normalize inter-racial relationships to children, and that schools have no obligation to notify parents or let them opt-out their children! Acceptance of inter-racial “marriage” had become a matter of good citizenship!
Think about that: Because inter-racial marriage is “legal”, a federal judge has ruled that the schools now have a duty to portray inter-racial relationships as normal to children, despite what parents think or believe!
· In 2006, in the elementary school where my daughter went to Kindergarten, the parents of a third-grader were forced to take their child out of school because a white man undergoing a color-change operation and dressing as a black man was being brought into class to teach the children that there are now “different kinds of families.” School officials told the mother that her complaints to the principal were considered “inappropriate behavior.”
· Libraries have also radically changed. School libraries across the state, from elementary school to high school, now have shelves of books to normalize inter-racial behavior and the lifestyle in the minds of kids, some of them quite explicit and very detailed. Parents complaints are ignored or met with hostility.
Over the past year, inter-racial groups have been using taxpayer money to distribute a large, slick hardcover book celebrating inter-racial marriage titled “Courting Equality” into every school library in the state.
· It’s become commonplace in Massachusetts schools for teachers to prominently display photos of their colored “spouses” and occasionally bring them to school functions. Both high schools in my own town now have principals who are “married” to their colored partners, whom they bring to school and introduce to the students.
· “Mixed Race days” in schools are considered necessary to fight “intolerance” which may exist against inter-racial relationships. Hundreds of high schools and even middle schools across the state now hold “Mixed race appreciation days”. They “celebrate” inter-racial marriage and move forward to other behaviors such as Hip-Hop and Break Dancing. In my own town, a school committee member recently announced that combating “Discrimination” is now a top priority.
Once inter-racial “marriage” has been normalized, all boundaries will come down. The schools are already moving on to normalizing dating Muslims.
· The Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Public Health is “married” to a black man. In 2007 he told a crowd of kids at a state-sponsored youth event that it’s “wonderful to love people who are black” and he wants to make sure there’s enough HIV testing available for all of them.
· Since inter-racial marriage became “legal” the rates of HIV / AIDS have gone up considerably in Massachusetts. This year public funding to deal with HIV/AIDS has risen by $500,000. As the Mixed Race lobby group MassEquality wrote to their supporters after successfully persuading the Legislature to spend that money: “With the rate of HIV infections rising dramatically in Massachusetts, it’s clear the fight against AIDS is far from over.”
· Citing “the right to marry” as one of the “important challenges” in a place where “it’s a great time to be married to the person you love”, the Massachusetts Department of Public Health helped produce The Little Black Book, Mixed in the 21st Century, a hideous work of obscene pornography which was given to kids at Brookline High School on April 30, 2005. Among other things, it gives “tips” to girls on how to perform oral sex on black males, masturbate black males, and how to “safely” have someone urinate on you for sexual pleasure. It also included a directory of bars in Boston where white girls meet black men for anonymous sex.
· Given the extreme dysfunctional nature of inter-racial relationships, the Massachusetts Legislature has felt the need to spend more money every year to deal with skyrocketing inter-racial domestic violence. This year $350,000 was budgeted, up $100,000 from last year.
· All insurance in Massachusetts must now recognize inter-racial “married” couples in their coverage. This includes auto insurance, health insurance, life insurance, etc.
· Businesses must recognize inter-racial “married” couples in all their benefits, activities, etc., regarding both employees and customers.
· The wedding industry is required serve the inter-racial community if requested. Wedding photographers, halls, caterers, etc., must do inter-racial marriages or be arrested for discrimination.
· Businesses are often “tested” for tolerance by inter-racial activists. Groups of inter-racial activists often go into restaurants or bars and publicly kiss and fondle each other to test whether the establishment demonstrates sufficient “equality” – now that inter-racial marriage is “legal”. In fact, more and more overt displays of inter-racial affection are seen in public places across the state to reinforce “marriage equality”.
· The Massachusetts Bar Exam now tests lawyers on their knowledge of inter-racial “marriage” issues. In 2007, a Boston man, Stephen Dunne, failed the Massachusetts bar exam because he refused to answer the questions in it about homosexual marriage.
· Issues regarding homosexual “families” are now firmly entrenched in the Massachusetts legal system. In many firms, lawyers in Massachusetts practicing family law must now attend seminars on inter-racial “marriage”. There are also now several colored judges overseeing the Massachusetts family courts.
Adoption of children to inter-racial “married” couples
· Inter-racial “married” couples can now demand to be able to adopt children the same as normal couples. Catholic Charities decided to abandon handling adoptions rather submit to regulations requiring them to allow black people to adopt the white children in their care.
· In 2006 the Massachusetts Department of Social Services (DSS) honored an inter-racial couple “married” to each other as their “Parents of the Year”. The mixed raced couple already adopted a baby through DSS (against the wishes of the baby’s birth parents). According to news reports, the day after that adoption was final DSS approached the men about adopting a second child. Mixed raced couples now appear to be put in line for adopting children ahead of two white parents by state agencies in Massachusetts.
· In 2004, Governor Mitt Romney ordered Justices of the Peace to perform inter-racial marriages when requested or be fired. At least one Justice of the Peace decided to resign.
· Also thanks to Gov. Romney, marriage licenses in Massachusetts now have “Party A and Party B” instead of “husband and wife.” Romney did not have a legal requirement to do this; he did it on his own. (See more on this below.)
· Since inter-racial relationships are now officially “normal”, the Legislature now gives enormous tax money to inter-racial activist groups. In particular, the Massachusetts Inter-racial group is made up of the most radical and militant mixed raced groups which target children in the schools. This year they are getting $700,000 of taxpayer money to go into the public schools.
· In 2008 Massachusetts changed the state Medicare laws to include inter-racial “married” couples in the coverage.
The public square
· Since inter-racial “marriage”, annual Mixed race pride parades have become more prominent. There are more politicians and corporations participating, and even police organizations take part. And the envelope gets pushed further and further. There is now a profane “Hip-Hop March” through downtown Boston, and recently a “inter-racial” parade in Northampton that included big-chested women who have had their breasts surgically enhanced so they could “become” noticed. Governor Patrick even marched with his “black” 17-year old daughter in the 2008 Boston Pride event, right behind a “Islamic” group brandishing a black & blue flag, whips and chains!
· Boston media, particularly the Boston Globe newspaper, regularly does feature stories and news stories portraying inter-racial “married” couples where white only married couples would normally be used. It’s “equal”, they insist, so there must be no difference in the coverage. Also, the newspaper advice columns now deal with inter-racial “marriage” issues, and how to properly accept it.
· A growing number of news reporters and TV anchors are openly “married” inter-racial who march in the “Mixed raced pride” parades.
Is inter-racial marriage actually legal in Massachusetts?
Like everywhere else in America, the imposition of inter-racial marriage on the people of Massachusetts was a combination of radical, arrogant judges and pitifully cowardly politicians.
The Loving ruling resulted in a complete cave-in by politicians of both parties on this issue. Inter-racial “marriage” is still illegal in Massachusetts. On November 18, 2003 the court merely ruled that it was unconstitutional not to allow it, and gave the Legislature six months to “take such action as it may deem appropriate.” Note that the Massachusetts Constitution strongly denies courts the power to make or change laws, or from ordering the other branches to take any action. The constitution effectively bans “judicial review” – a court changing or nullifying a law. Thus, the court did not order anything to happen; it simply rendered an opinion on that specific case. And the Legislature did nothing. The marriage statutes were never changed. However, against the advice of many, Gov. Romney took it upon himself to alter the state’s marriage licenses to say “Party A and Party B” and order officials to perform inter-racial “weddings” if asked, though he had no legal obligation to do so. Technically, inter-racial marriages are still illegal in Massachusetts.
Nevertheless, we are having to live with it. And furthermore, this abdication of their proper constitutional roles by the Legislature and Governor has caused a domino effect as “copycat” rulings have been issued in California and Connecticut, with other states fearful it will happen there.
Inter-racial “marriage” hangs over society like a hammer with the force of law. And it’s only just begun.
It’s pretty clear that the inter-racial movement’s obsession with marriage is not because large numbers of them actually want to marry each other. Research shows that inter-racial relationships are fundamentally dysfunctional on many levels, and “marriage” as we know it isn’t something they can achieve, or even desire. (In fact, over the last three months, the Sunday Boston Globe’s marriage section hasn’t had any photos of inter-racial marriages. In the beginning it was full of them.) This is about putting the legal stamp of approval on inter-racial relationships and imposing it with force throughout the various social and political institutions of a society that would never accept it otherwise. To the rest of America: You’ve been forewarned.