Mike Signorile has two more Grant Haas interview clips up.


The first clip is about what Haas said Haggard told him about Gayle Haggard’s knowledge of Haggard’s drug use and sexual activity. Haas said that Haggard told him that he and Gayle had a dildo molded of his penis — which they named “Ted Two” — which Gayle used to penetrate him. Some people have criticized this aspect of the story, asking why it is relevant. Others have said Haas could just as well be making it up, that it’s salacious gossip, etc. Yeah, it’s pretty hilarious. And yes, I honestly couldn’t care less what they do together, and really, I’m happy to see she’s actually enjoying herself if it’s true!

…The second clip is about Haggard’s first meetings with Grant Haas and how, according to Haas, Haggard decided he would be Haas’s counselor after finding out he was “struggling” with homosexuality. This is the one where he tells Haas that as a “top” Hass can go straight because “an asshole is similar to a vagina.”

I knew that Jesus’ General would weigh in on the action. He did so in a letter to fundie Pastor Steven L. Anderson of Faithful Word Baptist Church (more about him here). The General has some probing questions for the pastor.

But now, new information has come out about Pastor Haggard that makes me wonder if he is truly following our Lord’s commandments. I’m particularly concerned about this story from Pastor Haggard’s special acolyte, Brother Grant Haas (as recounted by Sister Pam):

When Haas asked about her [Haggard’s wife, Gayle] knowledge of these things, Ted told him “yes, she’s a freak too”, they went to sex toy stores and even molded a dildo together (calling it “Ted Two”), and put it into him.

I’m not sure what to think about this, so I’m asking you for guidance. Is this kind of thing acceptable? On the one hand, you have Mrs. Haggard strapping on a replica of the pastors little preacher and then giving him a right good rogering. That wouldn’t seem to be in keeping with Eph.5:22-24 which commands wives to be submissive.

…And, is it possible that by engaging in such an act, Pastor haggard was committing the sin of Onan? After all, he was sexually gratifying himself with his own proxy thingy. Or is being reamed by a replicate thingy acceptable? It’s not really addressed in Gen.38:9-10 or anywhere else in the Bible–King James Version, anyway– as far as I can see. They didn’t have silicone to make replicas back then, so it probably never came up. And, I think giving yourself a righteous rogering using natural equipment would be impossible. I know, I’ve never been able to do it. How about you?

Pam Spaulding

Pam Spaulding