McCain-Palin: Sloppy To No Vetting? How Can Anyone Trust McCain?
Is it me, or is a statewide tip line being set up for calls and information about potential abuse of power allegations, with Sarah Palin and members of her staff and her husband caught telling big, fat lies about their involvement in "abuse of power" allegations in the midst of a family custody wrangle a fairly big deal when you are looking at a running mate? Or where there are allegations of a wrongful firing to spite the man who wouldn’t fire her former brother-in-law?
Doesn’t this all sound like an episode of Dr. Phil gone wild rather than a presidential campaign?
Whatever the personal angle in all of this, the public interest question ought to be asked whether or not Palin was using the power of her office to settle a personal score, and whether said actions constituted a misuse of public funds, resources or otherwise distracted from the duties of her office and those of her employees involved in the ensuing mess.
Isn’t this about as basic a vetting question as you get in a Veep selection process?
"Are you currently or have you ever been involved in a criminal and/or civil investigation of wrongdoing? Do you have any depositions forthcoming in any legal matters? Have ethics questions arisen during your tenure in elected office which resulted in any investigative matter being opened? If so, please describe."
And if John McCain and his staff are so sloppy that they missed something that has been all over the evening news and newspapers in Alaska? What other corners has McCain been cutting that the public ought to know about? What other really obvious details is McCain missing on an array of other important matters?
How can anyone in America trust McCain’s judgment when he didn’t even bother to do basic homework on something as important as selecting his VP candidate?
(YouTube of Alaska newscast raising serious questions of Sarah Palin’s veracity in public statements via TPM.)