CommunityPam's House Blend

Freeper, fundie heads exploding over CA marriage ruling

UPDATE 5: Focus On The Family/CitizenLink reports Dr. James Dobson’s thoughts:

Dr. James Dobson, founder and chairman of Focus on the Family, is outraged by the court’s blatant disregard for marriage and the voters of California.

“The will of the people has now arrogantly been declared null and void,” he said. “In so doing, the justices have undermined and endangered the basic building block of society, which has been honored and preserved in every nation on earth through most of human history.”

UPDATE 4: Below the fold, a California fundie collection…Some California based religious right organizations comment.

UPDATE 3: The AFA of Pennsylvania joins in the fun below the fold.

UPDATE 2: Happy Happy Joy Joy! Here is The Peter:

How Will California Homosexual Couples Consummate their Counterfeit ‘Marriages’?

JUDICIAL ACTIVISM AT ITS WORST: This will always be immoral. California’s highest court has created a “fundamental” marriage right out of behavior – homosexuality – that is fundamentally wrong and destructive. At left is a homosexual male kissing scene as it appeared on the CBS soap “As the World Turns.” Everywhere Americans turn – TV, media, schools, in corporations and the courts – this unhealthy and immoral behavior is being promoted

(UPDATE: Bam Bam weighs in below the fold.)

Ah, before we get to the Freepi, how about this delicious reaction from the Family Research Council‘s Tony Perkins, who believes civil rights should be determined at the ballot box.

It’s outrageous that the court has overturned not only the historic definition of marriage, but the clear will of the people of California, as expressed in Proposition 22. said FRC President Tony Perkins. The California Supreme Court assumed the powers of a legislative body by imposing same-sex marriage. However, in 2000, the people of California spoke loudly and clearly on the value of marriage when 61 percent of voters approved Proposition 22.

The California Supreme Court has taken a jackhammer to the democratic process, and the right of the people to affect change in public policy. Four judges discarded the votes of 4,618,673 Californians who approved the states Defense of Marriage Act. Voters understand that children should not be deprived of a mother or a father, added Perkins.

I can’t wait for the flying spittle from Focus on the Anus, Bam Bam of Concerned Women for America and The Peter. Right now, take a look at the swamps of Freeperland as they wail, and in one case seems to be calling for violence (big surprise).

It’s below the fold.


Actual Freeper Quotes

…and the country continues its downward spiral toward oblivion.

Caligula would be proud of this decision. What next, animals?

There is a constitutional amendment in the works for voters to vote on in November, which could overturn this ruling. But California may be too socially liberal to overturn this court order. Stay tuned.

Unfortunately I”m unable to listen to Rush, has he mentioned this? And more importantly has he commented on this?

The militant homosexualists and their communist allies have now forced us to go to the labor and expense of amending the California constitution to make it absolutely clear that marriage will not be redefined out of existence in this state.

So be it. The amendment will pass in a landslide.

Here come the polygamists over the border to win their “rights” via the courts too…just wait a couple weeks.

California is beyond hope; let the Mexicans have it

In the years past this would be a big event. National Coverage, huge battle, Major Protests……now it even bare got covered in evening news.

Disastrous turn of events. Maybe the Religious Base would get motivated now.

Doesn’t look like it.  We are doomed.

As a long time California resident, I knew this disgusting day was coming. California was once a model state, the model in every respect for the other states of this country – fiscally, in education, and its politics. It was clean state, free from mega-perverison, copious numbers of illegal immigrants, and we had politicians that gave a damn about something other than their personal empowerment obtained through pandering and runaway spending.

Actually, I am surprised the vote was so close, given the runaway PC crap and liberalism that has turned California into a socialist dung heap. All this done too, without the regard for the legal nightmare that this move is going to make – as usual, ONLY LAWYERS WILL PROFIT from this. Meanwhile you will have to explain to your young children, how Mr. Jones and Mr. Smith can be man and “wife” – Actually, I am headed for San Francisco now, to marry my dog.

No, little boys and girls in public schools, that’s who’s next. And polygamy,.. and anything else until the word marriage has no meaning at all.

God instituted marriage way back at the “beginning”. And, satan’s been trying to destroy it ever sense. But, we all know (or should) who wins in the end.

This is probably the worst thing that could have happened for the liberals in this election. While it may not have the same deep impact as it did in 2004, there’s no way this helps Obama or the Dems in this election and it provides fuel for such constitutional amendments in both California and Arizona and Florida that will be before the voters this year. Any conservative fuel on the fire will make the Dems worry.

As for that fruitcake judge Ronald George, you’ve been living in Frisco, too long, Mr. Judicial Activist. You’re such a fruit.

Once again a few fruitcakes in black robes have overturned the will of the people.

I no longer wonder if their will be a revolution to save America but when.

Amazing!! You know why the gays fight so hard for “gay marriage”, right? Now every school must teach that this is an alternate lifestyle included with all others….that is the main reason. Your 6 year child will now be brainwashed into thinking this is “ok”….what a sick group of people. They won’t let 16 year old kids drink, smoke or drive, but they’ll let or support them having sex and risk getting all sexually transmitted diseases including HIV!!

BTW, did you know that 95% of civil unions end up separated before 3 years!!! 95%!!!!!



38 posted on Thursday, May 15, 2008 1:37:53 PM by Lancey Howard

It was inevitable. Never mind what the majority of California citizens want. The narcissistic judges follow the money showered by narcissistic gays who are so enamoured of their own bodily orifices and appendages that they crave others built exactly like themselves to play with, like toddlers. I recently read that the gay market has $60 billion in disposable income, which is why they are pandered to by politicians, media, and corporations. And you ain’t seen nothin’ yet, wait ’til Obama is president. Can we just find a state and secede NOW?

Any Constitutional Amendment is dead in the water because the GOP are milquetoast.

Much of “conservative” talk radio is in the back pocket of militant homo lobby due to their preponderant status in entertainment and advertising.

Now, more than ever, we need Alan Keyes for President. Before it’s too late. http://alankeyes.com He’s the complete Reagan conservative who has been right all along. The McCain GOP will do little more than wink at this travesty.

Things are just as sunny over at the Alliance Defense Fund:

“The government should promote and encourage strong families. The only way to make sure it does so in California is to amend the state constitution to protect marriage. That’s ultimately the only avenue to ensure that no one interferes with the will of the people,” said ADF Senior Counsel Glen Lavy, who argued before the court (www.telladf.org/news/story.aspx?cid=4413).

“The ruling from the court today ignores the will of the people of California who approved Proposition 22. The voters realize that defining marriage as one man and one woman is important because the government should not, by design, deny a child both a mother and father,” Lavy explained. “The court’s decision clearly demonstrates that marriage is not ultimately safe from tampering by activists and others in government until the voters have amended the constitution.”

Let’s go to Bob Adams of Alliance for Marriage (its board includes zero-sum civil rights activist Walter Fauntroy):

“In the most populous state in the Union, radical activists have convinced judges to ignore the will of the people and to follow the destructive lead of the Massachusetts courts in striking down the common sense definition of marriage,” said Matt Daniels, president and founder of the Alliance for Marriage Foundation. California is now ground-zero in the Battle to Protect Marriage, and the fight in California must now be joined in the Congress.

…”Given the continuous attacks upon marriage in courts across the country, AFM’s Marriage Protection Amendment is clearly the only hope for the American people to determine the future of marriage under our laws,” Daniels added.

Matt Barber of Concerned Women for America bleats (via The Peter)…

Matt Barber, CWA Policy Director for Cultural Issues [Barber is on the Board of Americans For Truth], said “The California Supreme Court has engaged in the worst kind of judicial activism today, abandoning its role as an objective interpreter of the law and, instead, legislating from the bench. It’s absurd to suggest that the framers of the California state constitution could have ever imagined there’d be a day when so-called ‘same-sex marriage’ would even be conceptualized, much less seriously considered. If anyone then had suggested the ridiculous notion, early Californians would have laughed their smocks off.

“So-called ‘same-sex’ marriage is counterfeit marriage. Marriage is, and has always been, between a man and a woman. We know that it’s in the best interest of children to be raised with a mother and a father. To use children as guinea pigs in radical San Francisco-style social experimentation is deplorable.

“The majority of Americans recognize the fact that legitimate marriage and family are cornerstones of a healthy society. Reasonable people have had enough and are refusing to allow radical extremists to redefine marriage and family into oblivion. So-called ‘same-sex marriage’ is a ridiculous and oxymoronic notion that has been forced into popular lexicon by homosexual activists and their extremist left-wing allies.

“If people who engage in homosexual behavior want to dress up and play house, that’s their prerogative, but we shouldn’t destroy the institutions of legitimate marriage and family in order to help facilitate a counterfeit.

UPDATE 3 (8:30 PM): Oh yesss…the American Family Association of Pennsylvania (not attributing the prolific Diane Gramley, but surely she’s behind this quote) has a conniption:

“The judges found there is a ‘fundamental right to form a family,’ where does such a statement end? How is family defined? Are families formed by incest between a father and his daughter, an uncle and niece, or by group marriages, one man three women, one women 10 men – how is a family formed under such a ludicrous court decision?” the group asked.

“These California judges have created chaos of marriage in that state and it will have ramifications across the country. There is no residency requirement in California nor do they have a Massachusetts-type law that says if your marriage is not legal in your state, you cannot marry here. The door has been opened for Pennsylvania’s and all other state’s Defense of Marriage Acts to be challenged. Same-sex commitment ceremonies in Philadelphia in November and State College in March have laid the groundwork for just such a challenge,” the group said.

Update 4 (7:30 PM PDT):

The California colection of religious right organization comments:

Campaign For Children And Families:

Veteran California pro-family leader Randy Thomasson, an official party in the consolidated marriage cases and president of Campaign for Children and Families, a statewide pro-family leadership organization, issued the following response to today’s California Supreme Court ruling licensing homosexual ‘marriages’:

‘On a 4-3 vote, the California Supreme Court has destroyed the civil institution of marriage between a man and a woman, and law-abiding Americans must condemn it in the strongest terms.  This arrogant judicial activism took 121 pages of contorted logic to explain and is no surprise coming from this San Francisco-based court.  By bowing down to homosexual activists and the rebel city of San Francisco, the California Supreme Court has exchanged the rule of law for the rule of unbridled power to destroy all that is good and sacred.  However, the terrible example of homosexual “weddings” should be short-lived.  This extremely bad ruling will certainly spur Californians to vote in November to overrule the judges and protect marriage licenses for a man and a woman in the California Constitution.  In the meantime, Governor Schwarzenegger should resist any temptation to sign any bill opposing the people’s vote on marriage.  This terrible opinion authored by Chief Justice Ron George makes him the chief target of California voters who know that marriage is only for a man and woman. George is up for reelection in 2010.’

The Capitol Resource Institute:

‘This is a very sad day for our nation and the democratic process,’ stated Karen England, executive director for Capitol Resource Institute. ‘The people of California decided eight years ago that marriage in our state will be defined as between one man and one woman. Four arrogant, elitist, activist judges decided that they know better than the people how marriage should be defined.’

‘It is a blow to our government system that activist judges would use the judicial system and baseless constitutional arguments to push their radical political agenda on citizens,” stated Meredith Turney, legislative liaison for Capitol Resource Institute.

Advocates Of Faith And Freedom (via Bob Unruh WingNutDaily):

The California Supreme Court today trashed society’s traditional institution of marriage, opening it up for same-sex duos because retaining the historic definition “cannot properly be viewed as a compelling state interest.

…”It is certainly disappointing  that the court, in declaring a right to same-sex marriage in the California Constitution, has shown an outrageous lack of respect for a majority of California voters and ignored a long history of legal precedent supporting traditional marriage,” said legal counsel Jennifer Monk of Advocates for Faith and Freedom (http://www.faith-freedom.com/), one of the organizations that worked on the case.

the folks behind the “California Protect Marriage Act” at ProtectMarriage.com:

‘The Court’s rationale for its decision should prompt outrage from the majority of California’s citizens,’ said Ron Prentice, chairman of the ProtectMarriage.com coalition. ‘The will of the people has been completely undermined by four individuals. In November, the people will have an opportunity to overrule the Court’s decision by passing a constitutional amendment – and California’s voters must respond by voting,’ concluded Prentice.

ProtectMarriage.com is a coalition of grassroots organizations, churches and voters, formed in order to place a constitutional amendment on the November 2008 ballot. The Supreme Court’s ruling coincides with the submission of 1.1 million signatures to California’s 58 counties. Known as the California Marriage Protection Act, the initiative’s signatures are now undergoing a review for validation. Based on the current projection of valid signatures, it appears the initiative will qualify for the ballot.

Previous post

Obey Wan Kenobi In the House

Next post

Corruption Bubbles Up Amid The Immigration 'Crackdown'

Pam Spaulding

Pam Spaulding

69 Comments