Watergate, the Farce
Watergate would not have played out the same way today because Congressno longer performs its oversight role, said Carl Bernstein, one of thejournalists famous for uncovering the story.
â€œThe difference with today is that the system did its job. The pressdid its job. The court did its job. The Senate committee did its job,â€Bernstein said Saturday. â€œThereâ€™s been great reporting on thispresident. But thereâ€™s been no oversight. We have a Democratic Congressnow and thereâ€™s still no oversight.â€Â
Bernstein also said that â€œ35 years of ideological warfareâ€ could also change how the public would react to such a scandal.
â€œWelive in a very different atmosphere today,â€ Bernstein said. â€œWithWatergate, eventually the people of this country looked around anddecided Nixon was a criminal president. Iâ€™m not sure the same chain ofevents would have taken place today.â€
I’m going to come back and comment on this in more depth. But for now, I’d like your opinion on the following:
- Bernstein blames Congress, implicitly excusing the press and the courts–or at least not commenting on their failure. Do you agree with his assessment, or do you think he’s just being polite?
- Somewhere during the early days of TNH, (Kagro? help? Update: Ah, here it is, thanks Kagro) Kagro did a great post suggesting that the Republicans neutralized the possibility of impeachment with the Clinton impeachment. Is that it? Or are there other reasons behind the changed ways the public has responded to Bush’s shredding of the Constitution?
- Would Republican oversight have been enough? That is, was there ever a time when Bernstein’s answer–congressional oversight–was a real possibility, or had Republicans simply placed their party ahead of the Constitution irrevocably?