CommunityPam's House Blend

Wingnut: Justice Thomas not hard on porn


Bob Peters of Morality in Media can’t imagine Clarence Thomas curbing “indecent material.” I wonder why?

Actually, I think he’s personally quite well-acquainted with porn and getting hard, if memory serves me well. 😉 There was that little matter of Long Dong Silver… Guess this pious boob wasn’t paying attention to Clarence’s confirmation hearings back in 1991.

The head of an organization dedicated to curbing obscenity in the media says if he had his choice, high court nominee John Roberts would become an associate justice rather than chief. Some observers have wondered why Bush did not choose one of the experienced strict constructionists on the court, such as Antonin Scalia or Clarence Thomas to head the bench.

However, Morality in Media president Robert Peters thinks he knows why President Bush did not try to elevate Scalia to the chief justice position. “My only explanation in terms of a defense of Bush,” Peters says, “is that he was told in no uncertain terms that Scalia is not going to get through, so don’t waste your time. If there was any other explanation, I think he sold us down the drain a little bit.”

On the other hand, the Morality in Media spokesman says he does not feel Justice Thomas has been a friend when it comes to curbing indecent material on television and the Internet. “It’s not that I’m going to become a total enemy of Justice Thomas,” Peters says, “but unless he has a change of heart on this issue, I don’t want the man to have more influence.”

Previous post

Baylor pinheads pull 'gay' Starbucks cup

Next post

Pam Spaulding

Pam Spaulding