“21st Century Marie Antoinette”
Olbermann took the gloves off tonight:
Politician after politician –” Republican and Democrat alike – has paraded before us, unwilling or unable to shut off the "I-Me" switch in their heads, condescendingly telling us about how moved they were or how devastated they were – congenitally incapable of telling the difference between the destruction of a city and the opening of a supermarket.
[M]ost chillingly of all, this is the Law and Order and Terror government. It promised protection – or at least amelioration – against all threats: conventional, radiological, or biological.
It has just proved that it cannot save its citizens from a biological weapon called standing water.
Mr. Bush has now twice insisted that, "we are not satisfied," with the response to the manifold tragedies along the Gulf Coast. I wonder which "we" he thinks he’s speaking for on this point. Perhaps it’s the administration, although we still don’t know where some of them are. Anybody seen the Vice President lately? The man whose message this time last year was, ‘I’ll Protect You, The Other Guy Will Let You Die’?
I don’t know which ‘we’ Mr. Bush meant.
For him, it is a shame – in all senses of the word. A few changes of pronouns in there, and he might not have looked so much like a 21st Century Marie Antoinette. All that was needed was just a quick "I’m not satisfied with my government’s response." Instead of hiding behind phrases like "no one could have forseen," had he only remembered Winston Churchill’s quote from the 1930’s. "The responsibility," of government, Churchill told the British Parliament "for the public safety is absolute and requires no mandate. It is in fact, the prime object for which governments come into existence."
Thanks, Keith. I needed that. Was it good for you? ‘Cos it was good for me.