TBogg

I guess you had to be there….

Shemp of the Power Line Three Stooges Tribute Blog (now with more sports! and music news!) has this to say about the Democratic Leadership:

Is the current leadership of the Democratic Party an embarrassment, or what? There’s Howard Dean, who “hates Republicans and everything they stand for,” imitates Rush Limbaugh snorting drugs, and vows to “use Terry Schiavo.” And there’s the increasingly out-of-control Harry Reid, who, just days after calling President Bush a “loser” in front of a group of students, did the previously unthinkable: he slandered a judicial nominee by referring to a “problem” disclosed in the nominee’s confidential FBI file–without, of course, referring to what the “problem” might be. This is really breathtaking; did Joe McCarthy ever stray this far over the line? Not that I can recall.

Well far be it for me to trash le skank’s dead boyfriend, but, yeah, I think McCarthy might have been a bit “over the line”:

The hunt for subversives started during the war itself, and was furthered by congressional committees that often abused their powers of investigation to harass people with whom they differed politically. Then in February 1950, an undistinguished, first-term Republican senator from Wisconsin, Joseph McCarthy, burst into national prominence when, in a speech in Wheeling, West Virginia, he held up a piece of paper that he claimed was a list of 205 known communists currently working in the State Department. McCarthy never produced documentation for a single one of his charges, but for the next four years he exploited an issue that he realized had touched a nerve in the American public.

He and his aides, Roy Cohn and David Schine, made wild accusations, browbeat witnesses, destroyed reputations and threw mud at men like George Marshall, Adlai Stevenson, and others whom McCarthy charged were part of an effete “eastern establishment.” For several years, McCarthy terrorized American public life, and even Dwight Eisenhower, who detested McCarthy, was afraid to stand up to him. Finally, however, the senator from Wisconsin over-reached himself.

In January 1954, in what were to be the first televised hearings in American history, McCarthy obliquely attacked President Eisenhower and directly assaulted Secretary of the Army Robert Stevens. Day after day the public watched McCarthy in action — bullying, harassing, never producing any hard evidence, and his support among people who thought he was “right” on communism began to evaporate. Americans regained their senses, and the Red Scare finally began to wane. By the end of the year, the Senate decided that its own honor could no longer put up with McCarthy’s abuse of his legislative powers, and it censured him in December by a vote of 65 to 22.

[…]

CENSURE OF SENATOR JOSEPH MCCARTHY

Resolved, That the Senator from Wisconsin, Mr. McCarthy, failed to cooperate with the Subcommittee on Privileges and Elections of the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration in clearing up matters referred to that subcommittee which concerned his conduct as a Senator and affected the honor of the Senate and, instead, repeatedly abused the subcommittee and its members who were trying to carry out assigned duties, thereby obstructing the constitutional processes of the Senate, and that this conduct of the Senator from Wisconsin, Mr. McCarthy, is contrary to senatorial traditions and is hereby condemned.

Sec 2. The Senator from Wisconsin, Mr. McCarthy, in writing to the chairman of the Select Committee to Study Censure Charges (Mr. Watkins) after the Select Committee had issued its report and before the report was presented to the Senate charging three members of the Select Committee with “deliberate deception” and “fraud” for failure to disqualify themselves; in stating to the press on November 4, 1954, that the special Senate session that was to begin November 8, 1954, was a “lynch-party”; in repeatedly describing this special Senate session as a “lynch bee” in a nationwide television and radio show on November 7, 1954; in stating to the public press on November 13, 1954, that the chairman of the Select Committee (Mr. Watkins) was guilty of “the most unusual, most cowardly things I’ve ever heard of” and stating further: “I expected he would be afraid to answer the questions, but didn’t think he’d be stupid enough to make a public statement”; and in characterizing the said committee as the “unwitting handmaiden,” “involuntary agent” and “attorneys-in-fact” of the Communist Party and in charging that the said committee in writing its report “imitated Communist methods — that it distorted, misrepresented, and omitted in its effort to manufacture a plausible rationalization” in support of its recommendations to the Senate, which characterizations and charges were contained in a statement released to the press and inserted in the Congressional Record of November 10, 1954, acted contrary to senatorial ethics and tended to bring the Senate into dishonor and disrepute, to obstruct the constitutional processes of the Senate, and to impair its dignity; and such conduct is hereby condemned.

Source: 83rd Congress, 2nd Session, Senate Resolution 301 (2 December 1954).

I blame Hindrockets lack of familiarity with recent American history to be the fault of Dartmouth College which has recently taken action to correct these shortcomings by electing a couple of whitebread dinks to the Board of Trustees with a mandate for smaller classes, “freer speech”, and “stronger athletics”.

We will be expecting a Dartmouth BCS Bowl bid within three years…or heads are gonna roll.

No word on those American history classes though.

Previous post

Blend Exclusive: interview with Jennifer Roberts on CharMeck gay rights initiatives

Next post

TBogg

TBogg

Yeah. Like I would tell you....