They eat their own

Boy. They just hate it when there isn’t absolute obedience. James Dobson wants to take a belt to a Senator:

The head of a leading conservative group said Sunday that Sen. Arlen Specter “is a big-time problem” and that his quest to serve as chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee “must be derailed.”

The comments from James Dobson, founder of the nonprofit Christian organization Focus on the Family, came four days after the moderate Republican from Pennsylvania told reporters that any Supreme Court nominee intent on overturning Roe v. Wade probably would not win Senate approval.

“When you talk about judges who would change the right of a woman to choose, who’d overturn Roe versus Wade, I think that is unlikely,” Specter said Wednesday, in the wake of President Bush’s re-election. “And I have said that bluntly during the course of the campaign, that Roe versus Wade was inviolate.”

That comment sparked an avalanche of criticism from Christian conservatives who supported Bush’s campaign. But Specter said Sunday that his remark was misconstrued and argued the uproar was fueled by people opposed to his “independence.”

Specter is in line for the Judiciary Committee chairmanship. The chairman has broad powers to advance or hold up a president’s judicial nominees.

“Senator Specter is a big-time problem for us,” Dobson said on ABC’s “This Week.” He said Specter had made “one of the most foolish and ill-considered comments that a politician has made in a long time.”

Dobson added, “There are many, many members of that committee that are more qualified and less of a problem than Senator Specter.”

For those not familiar with Dobson (comb-over, big dumbass glasses, sanctimonius chunk of weasel shit…that guy), here he is abusing a dog as an example of how to raise a child.

Also read here a recent Dobson interview with Hannity & The Gimp:

Joining us now is the author of the new “Strong-Willed Child,” and the founder and chairman of Focus on the Family, Dr. James Dobson.

Dr. Dobson, thank you very much for being with us tonight.

DR. JAMES DOBSON, CHAIRMAN OF FOCUS ON THE FAMILY: Alan, good to be with you again.

COLMES: Thank you, sir.

Should all religions have the opportunity to have their symbols displayed publicly?

DOBSON: No. That’s a much broader interpretation than we’ve had in the past. There is an historic context to the Ten Commandments. And, you know, given this court’s 42-year history of being antagonistic to religion, we just have really no confidence at all that they’re going to do the right thing.

COLMES: Yes, but if they’re going to have the Ten Commandments, if that is the standard, should all religions have the same opportunity to have their symbols displayed?

DOBSON: Well, I think if local municipalities have drawn that conclusion and that’s what they want to do, I guess they can. It should be an expression of government of the people, by the people and for the people.

But the truth of the matter is that this culture is largely Judeo- Christian, and that has been its heritage. And that’s been the history. And to come along now and sandblast half the buildings in Washington doesn’t make any sense at all.

COLMES: All right, the point is though, what’s good for one has to be good for all. You can’t say only these particular religions get to have their symbols displayed.

In 1980, the last time the Supreme Court (search) ruled on this, what it did was, I’m sure you’re familiar with this, struck down the Kentucky law requiring the posting of the Ten Commandments. Do you agree with that decision, or should there be a requirement that the Ten Commandments be posted in school?

DOBSON: I certainly do not agree with that. Seventy-two percent of the American people disagree with that decision.

And again, this goes all the way back to 1962, when the court began this hostility to religion, removing prayer in schools. The next year it was bible reading in schools. And then it was prayer at graduation ceremonies. And then it was the Ten Commandments. And from there to the Pledge of Allegiance.

It has been a consistent pattern. And we’re going to see it again, I’m afraid.

SEAN HANNITY, CO-HOST: Yes, and you know, you could see a correlation — and, by the way, good to see you, Dr. Dobson — with the decline of values in society with a lot of these court decisions. And I don’t think it’s by accident, by the way.

But I’ve got to compliment you. The “New Strong-Willed Child,” — I’ve finished it now — it’s an excellent book. I got a lot of advice. You know, I’m raising two kids. But they’re not that strong-willed like their dad, which is a good thing. They’ve got all their mother’s good qualities. It’s a great book.

DOBSON: I appreciate your comment, Sean.

Which is Sean’s way of saying that he has finally stopped beating his kids… as if being Sean Hannity’s kid isn’t punishment enough.



Yeah. Like I would tell you....