CommunityFDL Main Blog

This Day In Republican Totally-Not-Bigotry

Betty Sutton by ProgressOhio

Betty Sutton by ProgressOhio

I don’t know why so many people think Republicans are anti-women.  Most supposed examples of Republican sexism completely fall apart upon closer examination:

A recent newsletter from the Republican Party in Medina County, Ohio, flagged by EMILY’s List, contains a specific attack on Democratic Rep. Betty Sutton: “Let’s take Betty Sutton out of the House and put her back in the kitchen.”

County GOP chairman Bill Heck told TPMDC that the newsletter was “an attention-getter” in terms of its political rhetoric. “I’m not sure that it was intended — in fact I’m positive that it was not in intended to be sexist,” said Heck. “In fact, it was speaking to the people of that district, and not intended to be a sexist comment.”

“I mean, I have a wife that was elected twice to county office, and once was a judge. I’ve got two daughters,” Heck added.

You see?  Some of his best friends are women.  He’s even married to one – and he allows her to work!  Although it kind of sounds like he thinks the people in his district are sexist…

But when it comes to making a truly compelling case against Republican bigotry, it’s hard to top Jonah Goldberg:

First, here’s what I didn’t see [at the Cincinnati Tea Party rally]. I didn’t see a single racist or bigoted sign or hear a single such comment.


One of the more widespread anti-Tea Party arguments goes like this: Republicans didn’t protest very much when Bush ran up deficits and expanded government, so when Obama does the same thing (albeit on a far grander scale), Republican complaints can’t be sincere.

This lazy sophistry opens the door to liberals’ preferred argument: racism. “No student of American history,” writes Paul Butler in The New York Times, “would be surprised to learn that when the United States elects its first non-white President, a strong anti-government movement rises up.”


I speak for many who have actually spoken to Tea Partiers when I say that is slanderous hogwash.

Well, that’s a relief.  To think that we all foolishly believed the teabaggers are racist because they suddenly discovered their commitment to the Constitution and small government the second a Democrat became President, and not because they’re brandishing pictures of Obama with a bone through his nose.

Jonah then goes on to explain that maybe a tiny bit of the teabaggers’ inconsistency is due to partisanship; the rest is their choice to “prioritize supporting Bush — often in the face of far nastier attacks than Obama has received — over ideological purity” (which is nothing like partisanship) and a determination to not be fooled again after giving a Republican President a free pass (again, nothing like partisanship).

So, to sum up: You can’t be sexist if you’re married, and you can’t be racist if you’re mindlessly partisan and Jonah can’t read your signs.  Or something.

Previous post

"Your papers, please..."

Next post

Coming up on Food Sunday and Saturday Art